☝ Hover on title and click to watch the video, and scroll down to read more. Visiting the Maritime Museum Before the casinos and before the ...
-----------------------
Check out our Phoenix Translations's profile
At Phoenix Translations we are committed to providing accurate and efficient translations to meet your expectations and business needs.
Contact us today!
email: inquiry88phoenix@gmail.com
-----------------------
-----------------------
Check out our Phoenix Translations's profile
At Phoenix Translations we are committed to providing accurate and efficient translations to meet your expectations and business needs.
Contact us today!
email: inquiry88phoenix@gmail.com
The COVID-19 vaccines should have been recommended to people over 65 or to the immunocompromised to choose, however, during the pandemic and “for the prevention of COVID-19 transmission” governments were mandating and “recommending” the vaccination to everyone except for children under certain ages, and in some countries as the United States, COVID-19 vaccination was recommended for everyone ages 6 months and older. Now, we know that children don’t benefit from the vaccine, and there are no benefits for them, actually in children the harms of the vaccine outweigh the benefits. As soon as people were receiving the vaccine, adverse effects were reported less frequently with the first dose, nevertheless the most common systemic adverse effect was fatigue, more frequently reported with the second dose than with the first dose. Other systemic adverse effects included headache, nausea/vomiting, myalgias, arthralgias, and chills.
Prof. Carl Heneghan, Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at Oxford University, and an Urgent Care GP, who has been working on a series of articles which was based on his research on the medicines healthcare products regulatory agency, the body that is meant to oversee the safety of vaccines, drugs, and devices for the population. And what he’s found out is that the Medical Regulatory Authority is not working properly and that tens of thousands of people are either dead or disabled or harmed by drugs and devices where warnings were not picked up. He looked up at the different Covid vaccines and how they were approved and what were the shortcomings with the approval process of the vaccines. During the pandemic there was an expedited process; the vaccines were rushed through, and many of the important issues in the regulatory processes were missed out; particularly the safety of the drug, i.e., clinical trials to verify its potential to cause cancer and other side effects, as well as its effects on pregnant women. The important issue is that the decision to take a vaccine is about the benefits versus the harms, and if the benefits outweigh the harms, we can make an informed decision, and that's crucial to an evidence-based approach.
The AstraZeneca vaccine, through a collaboration with Oxford University, was first approved in the United Kingdom, and released to more than 170 countries. When in 2022 there was an excess of mortality on those who had taken the AstraZeneca vaccine, which was a quite significant mortality increase; at the time there was a lot of interest, because AstraZeneca had become available and then disappeared because there was a link between the AstraZeneca vaccine and a rare but serious side effect called thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), particularly in young adults, with blood clot and a particular type of blood clot that left some people disabled and in some cases led to death.
The AstraZeneca manufacturer said the vaccine didn’t stop the transmission, and in fact in the package says nothing about the transmission, the only reason to mandate a vaccine was not because it benefits you, it was because it was going to help prevent you passing it on to somebody else. However, we were told that it stopped transmission, and then there were claims that it reduces transmission, but these were never tested in the regulatory processes. It’s never been claimed by the manufacturers, and it's not in the most important document which is called “the package insert” which under the regulatory laws all of the information of the benefits and the harms has to go in.
What happened early on is lots of poor quality evidence letters, correspondence went to famous journals like the New England Journal of Medicine, that published them immediately said that we’ve got evidence that the vaccine reduces transmission, but this was very low quality retrospective data, it wasn’t the clinical trials, it wasn’t the regulatory data, and subsequently when people did better quality studies that actually said that the vaccines don’t prevent transmission, which is well-establish now; these vaccines do not prevent the onward transmission of the virus. If it did we would have seen a very different picture going into 2021 and 2022, but there were still talks of lockdowns despite all the huge number of people who have been vaccinated.
At the time many people, who were working in care homes and in the healthcare industry, lost their jobs because they refused to take the vaccine. Young people, particularly, were listening to some of the signals in the data and they were being cautious, but governments enforced that they would lose their jobs if they didn’t take the vaccine, and it was due to the enforcement of the vaccine, which was not right, that many people lost their jobs. People wanted to be informed and the important issue about any intervention is, ultimately, about informed consent, and the decision should have been up to us and not to physicians or to the governments. What they claimed was that the vaccines were important to reduce the number of patients and the burden on the hospitals, and to save lives.
The AstraZeneca vaccine was causing blood clots in combination with low platelet levels (thrombocytopenia), which are listed as a very rare side effect of the AstraZeneca vaccine. Most cases were observed in the first 3-4 weeks after vaccination that led to the death of younger people. As soon as these side effects were observed, some countries, namely, Sweden, Norway, and Denmark were pulling the AstraZeneca vaccine off the market, and yet in many other countries around the world this vaccine was still having it across all age ranges. Some people had blood clots, and of those, some have died. More than half of those were under 50s, so there were significant signals in younger people that not only was it causing significant harm, it was actually leading to death in some people. When the harms outweigh the benefits, it should have been pulled off the market earlier than it was.
Then the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines that replaced the AstraZeneca vaccine in some countries, also had their problems. The mRNA Covid-19 vaccines - in simple words - use coding to recode the body to disable the virus, while the normal vaccines use a weakened or inactivated virus; part of the pathogen to get the human body to recognise it. The mRNA molecule is delivered through the lipid nanoparticles that Moderna and Pfizer developed. This vaccine is a compound which is called a messenger RNA that goes into the cells and interacts with the cells and then produces a spike protein, that will then create the immune cells, which basically is a genetic recoding of the cells to produce a protein in order to be able to recognise the virus if it enters into your body. The mRNA, is encapsulated in a sort of packaging, if you will, and it’s called a lipid of nanoparticles, and then the LMPs (lysosomal membrane permeabilization), are a new technology that even the regulators said they didn’t know much about it, there were lots of things they didn’t know, like the biodistribution; where does it go; in rats it goes to the ovaries, the spleen, the liver and a bit everywhere else, but they’re in the major organs. When it gets there, how does it interact with the cellular surface? People have a lot of concerns about this, the more times you have the vaccine, does it build up and become toxic? Because they’re not clear how well it’s distributed, and how much it’s cleared and how long that takes. The messenger RNA is designed to take the messenger RNA around the body to evade the immune system, so this modified messenger RNA can go to all sorts of different organs, and one of the concerns is if it gets in the heart, and starts to produce these proteins and the immune system attacks the heart cells, then people get myocarditis, and that’s well-established, it’s factual because it’s in the packaging inserts, and it’s more likely to occur in younger males. So, there's a link between mRNA Covid-19 vaccines and an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis. Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle and pericarditis is inflammation of the lining around the heart. And this heart inflammation can be deadly.
Other concerns that Prof. Carl Heneghan had, were the clinical trials on people over 65-84, there were only 12 people in the trials, and there were nobody over 85 in the trials, and he questioned why those who would benefit most - the immunocompromised - were excluded. Also, they were supposed to do a large study of over 4,000 pregnant women, a randomized controlled trial in which half the people would receive the vaccine and half the people would receive placebo, to understand how this new vaccine works. They promised to have a trial with 4,000 pregnant women, yet less than 400 pregnant women were included in this clinical trial, not only that, those in the first trimester were excluded, that is, those most likely to have problems with influencing the baby’s development in those first 12 weeks, when the babies are developing all their organs, the heart, brain, legs, and arms, and after 12 weeks they are putting on weight. However, this vaccine was being promoted that all women of all stages of their pregnancy were strongly recommended to take the Covid vaccine, despite the fact that this vaccine had not been widely tested in pregnant women. And the problem here is that when a woman is pregnant, their immune system is downregulated to protect the fetus, i.e., to avoid the immune system to attack the fetus, so when a pregnant woman gets, for instance, a flu, they really get unwell. So when it comes to drugs, doctors need to be incredibly cautious when prescribing medication to pregnant women, and that is why doctors should not prescribe any new medication, unless it’s been widely studied in *pharmacokinetics in detail and they’ve done the clinical trials. (*Pharmacokinetics is the term that describes the four stages of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion of drugs. Drugs are medications or other substances that have a physiological effect when introduced to the body.)
The mRNA vaccines should have been studied and researched more widely, and the proper clinical trial done with the 4,000 pregnant women as promised, and followed up these women and their children for long enough to know the true effects of the mRNA vaccine.
In 1954, when the polio vaccine was developed, they tested it in randomized trials in 630,000 children, and over a million being brought into the controlled trials. There were over 1.6 million people in the trials, and they did that way, because they wanted to reassure the public that it was safe and effective. Now the clinical trials are done with 40,000 people and they follow them up for 28 days.
We all know, now, that all policy interventions, lockdowns, curfews, vaccines, use of masks, maintaining certain distance from each other, actually did not make any difference as a huge wave of people got infected by Covid, who then basically developed natural immunity, which is the way our immune system always dealt with a new pathogen. More and more people get it, and more and more people develop some natural immunity and that puts a break on the level of infection. In fact, another thing that is contentious is that if people should be vaccinated in the middle of the Winter when the risk of catching the infection is the greatest, because one of the things that has been discovered is what the Covid vaccine does do is that in a certain number of people, it drops their white blood cells, called lymphocytes, which are the cells that helps our immune system to fight against viral infections, so more lymphocytes is needed. If the vaccine does not affect transmission, the real question here is how it affects the course of the illness?
AstraZeneca’s authorization has been withdrawn worldwide. In May 2024, AstraZeneca withdrew the vaccine, later called Vaxzevria, which was on sale in some countries, but the company eventually also pulled it off from the markets citing “commercial reason”. Since 2023 the company has been sued by people who suffered severe side effects after receiving the jab.
The monovalent mRNA Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines are no longer authorised for use in the United States, effective as of 18 April 2023.
As time passes, and as we know more and more about these new vaccines and the technology of it; we can only reach one conclusion: that we all were enforced to be part of a worldwide social & medical experiment. Many of those who took the Covid vaccine “voluntarily”, they did so because if they didn’t, their movement and access to certain public spaces would be limited, they wouldn’t be allowed to enter these public spaces, meaning that as an unvaccinated person, you wouldn't be able to live a normal life outside your home, that is, you couldn't take public transports, you couldn't go to the supermarket buy food, your unvaccinated children wouldn't be allowed to enter their school, you couldn't go to your local health centre for your regular check-ups, you couldn't go to any public department to deal with personal or business matters, and so on, on and on... So what choice did you have other than "voluntarily" take the jab in order to be able to live a "normal life" in times of pandemic madness?
Only with time will we know the true consequences and effects of these vaccines on those healthy people who received the vaccine, presuming that serious scientists that are studying and researching on the effects of mRNA technology are not silenced into oblivion.
-----------------------
Contact us today
email: inquiry88phoenix@gmail.com
—-------------
sources and links of interest:
GBNews Health
Professor Carl Heneghan - UK Covid-19 Inquiry
Measuring vaccine efficacy from population data
Lysosomal membrane permeabilization and cell death
COVID‐19 vaccine side effects among nursing home residents and staff
COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker This site is no longer being updated. Data are accurate as of 2 Dec 2022.
-----------------------
Check out our Phoenix Translations's profile
At Phoenix Translations we are committed to providing accurate and efficient translations to meet your expectations and business needs.
Contact us today!
email: inquiry88phoenix@gmail.com
-----------------------
Check out our Phoenix Translations's profile
At Phoenix Translations we are committed to providing accurate and efficient translations to meet your expectations and business needs.
Contact us today!
email: inquiry88phoenix@gmail.com
